Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
text
stringlengths
10
360
5- Post mortem report.
blood started coming out.
hence, these appeals.
they have been proved.
testatrix died on 10.03.2009.
display D is produced.
no action was taken.
hence the present complaint.
she identified the accused.
no light was burning.
Ravinder Singh was relocated.
their appeals are dismissed.
he supports his case.
which have been raised.
he examined the witnesses.
then she reached Samastipur.
Bageshwar Kunar died issueless.
this is clearly impermissible.
this leads to absurdity.
sentence has been pronounced.
both of them reported.
9. application dismissed.
it cannot be both.
interim order is vacated.
this is not unjoint.
this is the man.
the object was laudable.
V. Sukhanpur 654.
he retired on 30.4.1995.
he retired on 31.03.1999.
he got two children.
which is not correct.
this cannot be assessed.
under the said notification.
it is not acceptable.
will that be just?
we loved Lakshmana Singh.
Suresh has falsely implicated.
one who wants him.
hence the trial proceeded.
the appellant is acquitted.
was he administered poison?
Ex.2 supports his claim.
the Prusadi Mandal died.
Krishna had three sons.
Bhambhu Thakur was informant-complainant.
he had become suspect.
one who sought Panchayat.
who are formal witnesses.
they were declared hostile.
her husband was unconscious.
he took him out.
Narayan Baghbe had died.
it was becoming worse.
he is a neighbour.
she later died allegedly.
plaintiff No.1 was dead.
he was closely related.
he went after it.
his father had died.
he was kept away.
hence, this appeal.
writ petition is dismissed.
no evidence is required.
he is on bail.
this leads to absurdity.
his hand was broken.
he went to Bhagalpur.
five persons were killed.
the trachea was congested.
Arun is her nephew.
hence, this appeal.
the petition is dismissed.
hence, this revision.
the sides were dark.
Ramzan was going along.
they had returned home.
her lips were swollen.
the prayer was then.
para 6 is contradictory.
five persons were killed.
he had occasional attacks.
his behaviour was indifferent.
he ordered an enquiry.
the injured was unconscious.
this appeal is allowed.
the mouth was empty.
the uteri was observant.
there are several instances.
it fulfils this expectation.
it is set aside.
they were living separately.
Ext.3: first information.
5. inquest report.
OBC 148 91 115 109
Scheduled Tribe 148 44 45
Scheduled Caste - 3.
Katihar 46 05 41 15
Bettiah 6 03 01 0103
Ext.5: formal FIR.
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

๐Ÿ“„ Evaluation of LLM for English to Hindi Legal Domain Machine Translation Systems

Test Suite Submission โ€“ WMT25-TS

Test Suite Name: Legal Domain English-Hindi Test Suite
Institution: AI & NLP Research Group, IIT Patna
Contact Email: boynfrancis[at]gmail[.]com

WMT25-TS Test Suite Submission โ€“ English to Hindi (Legal Domain)

Overview

This repository contains a test dataset prepared for the WMT25-TS Shared Task on English to Hindi Machine Translation, specifically targeting the Legal domain.

  • Language Pair: English โ†’ Hindi
  • Domain: Legal
  • Total Sentences: 5,000
  • Word Count Distribution: 100 sentences each for word lengths from 5 to 54 words

Objective

The goal of this test suite is to benchmark machine translation systems' performance in the legal domain across varying sentence lengths. This allows for fine-grained analysis of model behavior and robustness in legal language contexts.


Dataset Structure

Word Count Number of Sentences
5 100
6 100
7 100
... ...
54 100
Total 5000

Each group contains 100 English-Hindi parallel sentence pairs from legal texts such as:

  • Court judgments
  • Contracts
  • Legal notices
  • Statutory documents

Data Preparation

  • Source Collection: Public domain and open-licensed legal corpora
  • Cleaning & Filtering: Tokenized, length-filtered (5โ€“54 words), de-duplicated
  • Alignment: English-Hindi aligned with semi-automatic tools + manual verification
  • Validation: 10% of the dataset manually reviewed for quality and domain accuracy

Intended Use

  • For testing and evaluation only (not training)
  • Suitable for assessing translation quality across sentence lengths in the legal domain
  • Recommended for use in WMT-TS Shared Task submissions

Cite this Paper:

@InProceedings{singh-kumar-ekbal:2025:WMT2,
  author    = {Singh, Kshetrimayum Boynao  and  Kumar, Deepak  and  Ekbal, Asif},
  title     = {Evaluation of LLM for English to Hindi Legal Domain Machine Translation Systems},
  booktitle      = {Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Machine Translation (WMT 2025)},
  month          = {November},
  year           = {2025},
  address        = {Suzhou, China},
  publisher      = {Association for Computational Linguistics},
  pages     = {823--833},
  abstract  = {The study critically examines various Machine Translation systems, particularly focusing on Large Language Models, using the WMT25 Legal Domain Test Suite for translating English into Hindi. It utilizes a dataset of 5,000 sentences designed to capture the complexity of legal texts based on word frequency ranges from 5 to 54. Each frequency range contains 100 sentences, collectively forming a corpus that spans from simple legal terms to intricate legal provisions. Six metrics were used to evaluate the performance of the system: BLEU, METEOR, TER, CHRF++, BERTScore and COMET. The findings reveal diverse capabilities and limitations of LLM architectures in handling complex legal texts. Notably, Gemini-2.5-Pro, Claude-4, and ONLINE-B topped the performance charts in terms of human evaluation, showcasing the potential of LLMs for nuanced translation. Despite these advances, the study identified areas for further research, especially in improving robustness, reliability, and explainability for use in critical legal contexts. The study also supports the WMT25 subtask focused on evaluating the weaknesses of large language models (LLMs). The dataset and related resources are publicly available at https://github.com/helloboyn/WMT25-TS.},
  url       = {https://aclanthology.org/2025.wmt-1.57}
}
Downloads last month
13